Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership (2010)

Docket
10-290
Decided
2010-01-01

Summary

Question: Must a challenge to a patent's validity offer clear and convincing evidence as proof? Conclusion: Yes. The Supreme Court affirmed the lower court order in a unanimous opinion by Justice Sonia Sotomayor. "Section 282 requires an invalidity defense to be proved by clear and convincing evidence," Sotomayor wrote. Justice Stephen Breyer wrote a concurring opinion joined by Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito, in which he "join[s] the Court's opinion in full" but added that "I write separately because, given the technical but important nature of the invalidity question, I believe it worth emphasizing that in this area of law as in others the evidentiary standard of proof applies to questions of fact and not to questions of law."

View the full interactive analysis on SCOTUS Lens →