Camara v. Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco (1966)

Docket
92
Decided
1966-01-01
Category
General

Summary

Question: Do §503 of the SFHC, which authorizes inspection of private dwellings without a warrant, and §507, which makes it a crime to refuse such an inspection, violate the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments? Conclusion: Yes. Justice Byron R. White, writing for a 6-3 majority, vacated the lower judgment. The Supreme Court held that Camara had a constitutional right to insist that the inspector obtain a warrant before searching his home. He also cannot be convicted for refusing to consent to the inspection. This decision overruled Frank v. Maryland<./i> Justice Tom C. Clark dissented, arguing that Frank v. Maryland settled the question and must be followed. Justice John M. Harlan and Justice Potter Stewart joined in the dissent

View the full interactive analysis on SCOTUS Lens →