City of Los Angeles v. Lyons (1982)

Docket
81-1064
Decided
1982-01-01

Summary

Question: Did Lyons's injunction against the use of police chokeholds meet the threshold requirements imposed by Article III of the Constitution? Conclusion: No. In a 5-to-4 decision, the Court held that federal courts were without jurisdiction to entertain Lyons' claim for injunctive relief. The fact that Lyons had been choked once did nothing to establish "a real and immediate threat that he would again be stopped. . .by an officer who would illegally choke him into unconsciousness." The Court held that in order to establish an actual controversy, Lyons would have to show either 1) that all Los Angeles police officers always choked citizens with whom they had encounters, or 2) that the City ordered or authorized officers to act in such a manner. Lyons was thus limited to suing the police and the city for individual damages.

View the full interactive analysis on SCOTUS Lens →