Lucas v. South Carolina Coast Council (1991)

Docket
91-453
Decided
1991-01-01

Summary

Question: Does the construction ban depriving Lucas of all economically viable use of his property amount to a "taking" calling for "just compensation" under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments? Conclusion: Yes. In a 6-to-2 decision, the Court relied on the trial court's finding that Lucas's lots had been rendered valueless by the state law. "[W]hen the owner of real property has been called upon to sacrifice all economically beneficial uses in the name of the common good...he has suffered a taking."

View the full interactive analysis on SCOTUS Lens →