Board of Directors, Rotary International v. Rotary Club of Duarte (1986)
- Docket
- 86-421
- Decided
- 1986-01-01
Summary
Question: Did a law which required California Rotary Clubs to admit women members violate Rotary International's First Amendment rights of association? Conclusion: No. Considering the size, purpose, selectivity, and exclusivity of Rotary's membership, the Court found that the relationship among the club's members was not of the intimate or private variety which warrants First Amendment protection. Writing for the unanimous Court, Justice Powell argued that because many of Rotary's activities (including their meetings) are conducted in the presence of strangers, and because women members would not prevent the club from carrying out its purposes, there was no violation of associational rights. Furthermore, even if there were a slight encroachment on the rights of Rotarians to associate, that minimal infringement would be justified since it "serves the State's compelling interest" in ending sexual discrimination.