Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc. (2013)

Docket
11-1507
Decided
2013-01-01

Summary

Question: 1. Did the Township's redevelopment plans have a racially disparate impact in violation of the Fair Housing Act? 2. If so, does the burden then shift to the Township to show that there were no less discriminatory alternatives available? Conclusion: Unanswered. Prior to argument, the parties settled out of court, and the case was dismissed.

View the full interactive analysis on SCOTUS Lens →