Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1989)

Docket
88-1569
Decided
1989-01-01

Summary

Question: Did the Michigan Campaign Finance Act violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments? Conclusion: No. In making its case, the Michigan Chamber of Commerce argued that it should have been excluded from the act's restrictions since the Chamber was a "nonprofit ideological corporation" which was more analogous to a political association than a business firm. The Court disagreed and upheld the Michigan law. Justice Marshall found that the Chamber was akin to a business group given its activities, linkages with community business leaders, and high degree of members (over seventy-five percent) which were business corporations. Furthermore, Marshall found that the statute was narrowly crafted and implemented to achieve the important goal of maintaining integrity in the political process.

View the full interactive analysis on SCOTUS Lens →