Ferguson v. Skrupa (1962)
- Docket
- 111
- Decided
- 1962-01-01
- Category
- General
Summary
Question: Did the Kansas regulation of debt adjusting violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? Conclusion: No. The Court reversed the decision of the lower court and affirmed Kansas's right to regulate debt adjusting. The unanimous decision held that the question of whether the law was wise or reasonable was a legislative and not a judicial one. Justice Black argued that the lower court's ruling relied on old law; the Court had moved out of the business of using the "vague contours" of the Fourteenth Amendment to strike down laws which it had deemed economically unwise. Those were issues for state and national legislatures to address and not the courts. As long as state regulations do not offend a "specific federal constitutional prohibition" or a "valid federal law," they are legitimate.