Diamond v. Chakrabarty (1979)

Docket
79-136
Decided
1979-01-01

Summary

Question: Is the creation of a live, human-made organism patentable under Title 35 U.S.C. Section 101? Conclusion: Yes. In a 5-to-4 decision, the Court explained that while natural laws, physical phenomena, abstract ideas, or newly discovered minerals are not patentable, a live artificially-engineered microorganism is. The creation of a bacterium that is not found anywhere in nature, constitutes a patentable "manufacture" or "composition of matter" under Section 101. Moreover, the bacterium's man-made ability to break down crude oil makes it very useful.

View the full interactive analysis on SCOTUS Lens →