Bailey v. Alabama (1900)

Docket
300
Decided
1900-1940-

Summary

Question: Did the Alabama law violate the Thirteenth Amendment? Conclusion: The Court, through Hughes, argued that the law was a restriction on personal rights. Judged by its effect and not by its pretense, the law violated the Thirteenth Amendment. Involuntary servitude meant more than slavery.

View the full interactive analysis on SCOTUS Lens →