Democratic Party of United States v. Wisconsin ex rel. La Follette (1980)

Docket
79-1631
Decided
1980-01-01

Summary

Question: Can a state compel a National Party Convention to admit delegates from its state if those delegates were selected in a manner violating the National Party's rules? Conclusion: No. In a 6-3 opinion authored by Justice Potter Stewart the Court reversed the decision of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Referring to its decision in Cousins v. Wigoda , the Court held that the "First Amendment freedom to gather in association for the purpose of advancing shared beliefs is protected by the Fourteenth Amendment from infringement by any State." Granting states the power to place delegates in a National Convention over party objections to how they were selected would impair the right of political parties to associate with whom they wish, especially when non-party members could influence the interests of the delegates. Justice Lewis Powell argued in his dissent that Wisconsin's "compelling interest" to involve non-affiliated voters in the primary justified this burden on the freedom of association, although the majority held that this could be accomplished without intruding upon internal party rules.

View the full interactive analysis on SCOTUS Lens →